Skip to main content

Clay v. State

Citations

  • 725 S.E.2d 260
  • 290 Ga. 822
  • 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 982
  • 2012 Ga. LEXIS 301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the date the evidence of the prior conviction was introduced constituted the end point for determining whether ten years had elapsed since defendant’s prior convictions
  • holding that the date the evidence of the prior conviction was introduced, constituted the end point for determining whether ten years had elapsed since defendant’s prior convictions
  • holding that the trial court was required to make specific findings on the record when determining, pursuant to OCGA § 24-9-84.1, whether evidence of a defendant’s past conviction is more probative than prejudicial
  • holding that the trial court was required to make specific findings on the record when determining, pursuant to OCGA § 24-9-84.1, whether evidence of a defendant’s past conviction is more probative than prejudicial
  • noting that the “centrality of the credibility issue” is a factor in whether to admit the prior conviction
  • noting that “Patane held that the suppression of the physical fruits of a defendant’s unwarned but voluntary statements is not constitutionally required . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.