Vergara v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a suspect who has invoked his right to counsel may be subjected to further questioning if he reinitiates the interrogation and validly waives his rights to counsel and to remain silent
• “‘[W]here controlling facts are not in dispute, . . . such as those facts discernible from a videotape, our review is de novo.’”
• “where controlling facts are not in dispute, such as those facts discernible from a videotape, our review is de novo”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).