Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 409 S.E.2d 649
  • 261 Ga. 640
  • 1991 Ga. LEXIS 870

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering that the trial court in virtually all other situations is presumed to know and apply the correct law unless the contra be shown
  • noting that some of the purposes which have been deemed appropriate include guilty knowledge and intent
  • noting that some of the purposes which have been deemed appropriate include guilty knowledge and intent
  • reversing where the trial court did not make the findings required by Rule 31.3 and “the state presented no evidence to the jury to establish [the necessary] similarity or connection”
  • reversing where the trial court did not make the findings required by Rule 31.3 and “the state presented no evidence to the jury to establish [the necessary] similarity or connection”
  • outlining the three-prong test for determining whether evidence of an independent act may be admissible as similar transaction evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

744 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.