Skip to main content

Bryant v. State

Citations

  • 708 S.E.2d 362
  • 288 Ga. 876
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 794
  • 2011 Ga. LEXIS 251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that this Court has deemed victim impact testimony describing the victim’s life and the impact of his or her loss on his or her family as being appropriate
  • affirming admission of e-mails sent by the defendant as admissions of a party pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 801 (d) (2
  • affirming admission of e-mails sent by the defendant as admissions of a party pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 801 (d) (2) (A)
  • reversing death sentence due to admission of improper victim impact testimony
  • “Questions . . . that call for prejudgment are improper in a voir dire examination.”
  • to prove a prima facie jury pool composition violation, defendant is required to show that the allegedly excluded group was actually underrepresented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melton, Hunstein, Benham, Thompson, Hines, Ray, Carley, Nahmias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

88 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.