Skip to main content

Clark v. State

Citations

  • 299 Ga. 552
  • 787 S.E.2d 212
  • 2016 WL 3145123
  • 2016 Ga. LEXIS 406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant failed to show prejudice on his claim that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to introduce certain evidence at trial because the defendant failed to show on motion for new trial that that evidence would have been admissible at trial
  • holding that the defendant failed to show prejudice on his claim that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to introduce certain evidence at trial because the defendant failed to show on motion for new trial that that evidence would have been admissible at trial
  • “[T]he prosecutor’s comments, when viewed in their full context, were not comments on Clark’s pre-arrest silence. . . . [H]is trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance by failing to make this meritless objection to the comments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.