Supreme Court· 6/20/1983
Illinois v. Lafayette
Citations
- 462 U.S. 640
- 103 S. Ct. 2605
- 77 L. Ed. 2d 65
- 1983 U.S. LEXIS 71
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that arrestee’s person may be searched at the police station and the discovered items inventoried without warrant or probable cause
- holding that ”[t]he reasonableness of any particular government activity does not necessarily or invariably turn on the existence of alternative ‘less intrusive’ means”
- holding that the police may search any container or article in an arrestee's possession \as part of the routine procedure incident to incarcerating an arrested person\
- holding that the police may search any container or article in an arrestee's possession “as part of the routine procedure incident to incarcerating an arrested person”
- holding that the inventory search of personal effects of an arrestee at a police station was also permissible under the Fourth Amendment
- holding that opening and inventorying a shoulder bag was reasonable despite the possible alternative of securing the bag as a whole
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burger, White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Marshall, Brennan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
728 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 2,391×
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court· 1987-01-14· cited 1,722×
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 1,569×
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 1,409×
- Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court· 2004-02-24· cited 1,303×
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court· 1987-03-31· cited 1,069×
- Florida v. WellsSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,010×
- Maryland v. KingSupreme Court· 2013-06-03· cited 671×
- Scott v. HenrichNinth Circuit· 1994-09-09· cited 544×
- Medina v. CramTenth Circuit· 2001-06-12· cited 519×
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 519×
- People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1987-11-12· cited 490×
- McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-04-23· cited 463×
- State v. GarciaNebraska Supreme Court· 2019-03-08· cited 376×
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-07-30· cited 360×
- State v. CrutcherTennessee Supreme Court· 1999-04-12· cited 331×
- Mary Beth G. v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1983-11-29· cited 328×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,633×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 3,483×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court· 1950-02-20· cited 2,080×
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 1,583×
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,484×
- United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court· 1974-03-26· cited 917×
- People v. LafayetteAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-09-10· cited 19×
Other cases named Illinois v. Lafayette
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.