Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/17/1982
Clark v. State
Citations
- 627 S.W.2d 693
- 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 856
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “coupling of the right ‘not to make a statement’ with the right to ‘terminate any interview at any time’ if the appellant ‘decided to talk with us’ adequately conveyed the right to remain silent”
- “[t]he simple practice of reading to a defendant the warnings set out in [article 38.22] would eliminate the problem of non-compliance with the precise warnings set out in Miranda”
- \functional equivalent\ of the precise words of the statute sufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tom G. Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-03-27· cited 418×
- Dancy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-03-18· cited 269×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-09-19· cited 244×
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-01-09· cited 181×
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-04-14· cited 75×
- Melton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-05-23· cited 74×
- Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-01-18· cited 64×
- Fields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-02-03· cited 55×
- Ex Parte GuzmonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-04-08· cited 48×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-12-15· cited 46×
- Hougham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-09-14· cited 44×
- Hernandez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-01-07· cited 39×
- Timothy Hutchison v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2014-02-05· cited 39×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-08· cited 35×
- Kivean Deshai Coffey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2014-06-13· cited 28×
- Earhart v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1998-01-09· cited 27×
- Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-07-08· cited 25×
- Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1987-05-21· cited 22×
- Reimer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1983-09-01· cited 21×
- State v. SubkeTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1995-11-01· cited 18×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,633×
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 3,001×
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 2,053×
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,808×
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1977-12-12· cited 676×
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-01-26· cited 257×
- Esquivel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-01-09· cited 256×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-10-06· cited 208×
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. BlackwellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-10-10· cited 146×
- Ex Parte GilesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-12-05· cited 138×
- Nicholas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-09-25· cited 130×
- Holloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-04-01· cited 126×
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-09-23· cited 116×
- Clemons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-07-16· cited 105×
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-03-15· cited 105×
- Whan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-06-28· cited 103×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.