Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 9/19/1984

Smith v. State

Citations

683 S.W.2d 393
1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that nothing was preserved for appellate review when appellant did not cite authority and did not present argument on issue
holding objection for \failure to lay predicate\ too general to preserve error
“sufficiency of a predicate is addressed to the discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion”
\sufficiency of a predicate is addressed to the discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion\
\sufficiency of a predicate is addressed to the discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion\ and lay witness may give \opinion regarding things within his common knowledge\
\sufficiency of a predicate is addressed to the discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion\ and lay witness may give \opinion regarding things within his common knowledge\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion, Clinton, Teague, Eaker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

167 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

83 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.