Skip to main content

Hougham v. State

Citations

  • 659 S.W.2d 410
  • 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellant’s objection “to this line of argument” was too general to apprise trial court of grounds for objection
  • holding appellant’s objection “[w]e will object to this line of argument” too general to apprise trial court of ground for his objection regarding complaint about prosecutor’s jury argument
  • holding appellant’s objection ―[w]e will object to this line of argument‖ too general to apprise trial court of ground for his objection regarding complaint about prosecutor’s jury argument
  • holding objection to “this line of argument” not specific enough to preserve error
  • holding objection to “this line of argument” not specific enough to preserve error
  • concluding error was not properly preserved where defense counsel stated, “We will object to this line of argument” because objection “was clearly too general to apprise the trial court of the ground for his objection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion, Clinton, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.