Supreme Court· 12/12/1977

Moore v. Illinois

Citations

434 U.S. 220
98 S. Ct. 458
54 L. Ed. 2d 424
1977 U.S. LEXIS 163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an uneounseled identification conducted at a preliminary hearing violated the accused’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel
holding that Sixth Amendment violation concerning corporeal identification of the accused without counsel present is subject to harmless error analysis pursuant to Chapman
noting that an attorney “can serve both his client’s and the prosecution’s interests by objecting to suggestive features of a procedure before they influence a witness’ identification”
noting that an attorney “can serve both his client’s and the prosecution’s interests by objecting to suggestive features of a procedure before they influence a witness’ identification”
remanding for harmless error analysis after denial of assistance of counsel at a preliminary hearing
remanding case for determination of whether failure to exclude evidence obtained in violation of Sixth Amendment Counsel Clause was harmless constitutional error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powell, Rehnquist, Blackmun, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

454 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.