Ninth Circuit· 4/15/2002

Christian v. Mattel, Inc.

Citations

286 F.3d 1118
2002 WL 571805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the “district court has considerable latitude in managing the parties' motion practice and enforcing local rules”
indicating that Rule 11 does not permit a court to rely on “conduct in other litigation” in imposing sanctions
finding that district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding sanctions where counsel “sought to resurrect [a] copyright claim by deluging the district court with supplemental filings.”
setting forth standard of review and noting a district court’s “considerable latitude in managing the parties’ motion practice”
setting forth standard of review and noting a district court’s “considerable latitude in managing the parties’ motion practice”
setting forth standard of review and noting a district court’s “considerable latitude in managing the parties’ motion practice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKeown, Schroeder, Zilly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.