Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc. Michael Shipp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court must 16 consider a litigant’s pro se status in determining whether the Rule 11 violation was objectively 17 reasonable
• noting that the court must 16 consider a litigant’s pro se status in determining whether the Rule 11 violation was objectively 17 reasonable
• noting that the court must 2 consider a litigant’s pro se status in determining whether the Rule 11 violation was objectively 3 reasonable
• noting that the court must 2 consider a litigant’s pro se status in determining whether the Rule 11 violation was objectively 3 reasonable
• holding 17 that misstatements made during oral argument cannot constitute sanctionable offenses under Rule 11
• rejecting argument that “a party who defends a Rule 11 sanction on appeal should be awarded the costs of attorneys’ fees automatically.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).