Q-Pharma, Inc. v. The Andrew Jergens Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statement that “further pursuit of the lawsuit would not have been worth the investment” was not evidence of bad faith
• noting that Rule 11 “requires an attorney to conduct a reasonable inquiry into the law and facts before filing a pleading”
• concluding, in an appeal from a denial of a fee award, that a party's decision to proceed with a lawsuit was not frivolous \in light of the statutory presumption of validity\
• testing unnecessary for purposes of Rule 11 and § 285 where the product labels, among other things, supported infringement
• Tenth Circuit precedent governs the imposition of Rule 11 violations
• “exceptional eases” include those involving “willful infringement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).