Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Federal Circuit· 7/29/2011

Eon-Net LP v. Flagstar Bancorp

Citations

  • 653 F.3d 1314
  • 99 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1522
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15650
  • 2011 WL 3211512

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the burden of unnecessarily requiring a “district court to engage in excessive claim construction before it is able to see the lack of merit of the patentee’s infringement allegations”
  • assessing the reasonableness of the plaintiff's claim construction positions under the clear error standard
  • “[W]e are mindful that the district court has lived with the case and the lawyers for an extended period.”
  • “[W]e are mindful that the district court 4 has lived with the case and the lawyers for an extended period.”
  • “[W]e are mindful that the district court 4 has lived with the case and the lawyers for an extended period.”
  • relying on litigation misconduct and baseless infringement assertions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Mayer, O'Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Eon-Net LP v. Flagstar Bancorp

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.