B.K.B., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Maui Police Department, County of Maui, County of Maui, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the court’s inherent power to impose sanctions for conduct that is tantamount to bad faith
• “Under Title VII, a plaintiff must exhaust her administrative remedies by filing a 13 timely charge with the EEOC, or the appropriate state agency”
• “I was retaliated against for engaging in protected activity in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended.”
• attorney’s . 1 || knowing and reckless introduction of inadmissible evidence was tantamount to bad faith 2 ||and warranted sanctions under § 1927 and the court’s inherent power.
• a plaintiff must 4 | first file a complaint with the EEOC or appropriate state agency before it can sue under the ADA 5 | or Title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).