Chao v. Westside Drywall, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that maintenance of records weighed in favor of joint employment given “evidence that Defendants required the claimants to track their work on time sheet worksheets, and that the claimants were required to turn these documents in to [the putative joint employer]”
• finding 15 defendants exercised control where they made all decisions about what materials were 16 used for the project, which project sites work crews were assigned to, and “regularly 17 visited the job sites to provide supervision and instruction”
• “Based on the analysis 10 of the economic reality factors, the court concludes that there is sufficient evidence for a 11 reasonable jury to find that Defendants[] were joint employers.”
• “The first three declarations 2 contained within Exhibit 18 are not given under penalty of perjury. These declarations are not 3 made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, therefore they do not satisfy the requirements of 4 FRCP 56(e) and are not admissible as evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).