Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Technologies, Corp. [Corrected Cover Sheet on 04/26/07]

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Supreme Court has determined that FERPA does not contain rights-creating language because it speaks only to the Secretary of Education
• explaining that a claim need not cover every embodiment where the patentee has drafted different claims to cover different embodiments
• upholding construction of “length” in phrase “extend the length of” as “extent from end to end” because, inter alia, “[t]he verb ‘extend’ already suggests that the ‘length’ reaches from one end to another”
• under Phillips, “the court consults primarily the claims themselves in context, with much of that context supplied by the specification and the prosecution history”
• “An independent claim impliedly embraces more subject matter than its narrower dependent claim.”
• “An independent claim impliedly embraces more subject matter than its narrower dependent claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).