Holgate v. Baldwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 19 a sanctions motion was untimely because it was served 10 months after the complaint was filed, 20 leaving the complaint filer no opportunity “to correct the offending paper or to counsel the 21 [client] to withdraw it”
• stating that “[w]e must reverse the award of sanctions when the 18 || [moving] party failed to comply with the safe harbor provisions, even when the underlying filing is frivolous”
• holding the fact an attorney \was allowed to withdraw as counsel due to a conflict of interest [did] not protect him from sanctions based on a filing that he made before that withdrawal\
• finding that a frivolous complaint was a proper basis for Rule 11 sanctions
• holding the fact an attorney “was allowed to withdraw as counsel due to a conflict of interes t [did] not protect him from sanctions based on a filing that he made before that withdrawal”
• construing \frivolous filing\ in the context of Rule 11 and quoting Keegan Mgmt., 78 F.3d at 434

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).