Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/8/1999

Gibson v. State

Citations

514 S.E.2d 320
334 S.C. 515
1999 S.C. LEXIS 57

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

providing \the evidence [must be] favorable to the accused\ for its nondisclosure to constitute a Brady violation
holding a defendant asserting a Brady claim for violation of due process must demonstrate: (1) the evi dence was favorable to the defendant; (2) it was in the possession of or known to the prosecution; (3) it was suppressed by the prosecution; and (4
providing evidence must be \suppressed by the prosecution\ to support a Brady violation claim
noting the United States Supreme Court identified three distinct categories of Brady violations
\A defendant who pleads guilty usually may not later raise independent claims of constitutional violations.\
\A defendant who pleads guilty usually may not later raise independent claims of constitutional violations.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Finney, Toal, Moore, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.