Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/16/2001
State v. Lynch
Citations
- 545 S.E.2d 511
- 344 S.C. 635
- 2001 S.C. LEXIS 73
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the trial court did not have jurisdiction after an amendment to an indictment where the substituted aggravating circumstance was quite distinct from the original circumstance and required proof that was materially different
- holding the nature of the offense changed when an indictment for first-degree burglary was amended to change the aggravating circumstance from entering during darkness to causing physical injury because “the proof required for each aggravating circumstance [was] materially different”
- holding the nature of the offense changed when an indictment for first-degree burglary was amended to change the aggravating circumstance from entering during darkness to causing physical injury because \the proof required for each aggravating circumstance [was] materially different\
- indictment may be amended provided such amendment does not change nature of offense charged
- indictment may be amended provided such amendment does not change nature of offense charged
- A circuit court has subject matter jurisdiction if: (1) there has been an indictment which sufficiently states the offense; (2) there has been a waiver of indictment; or (3) the charge is a lesser included charge of the crime charged in the indictment.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waller, Toal, Burnett, Pleicones, Gregory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-03-07· cited 229×
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-05· cited 161×
- State v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-10-28· cited 22×
- State v. GillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-06-23· cited 18×
- State v. LaCosteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-25· cited 17×
- State v. DudleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-14· cited 17×
- State v. MeansSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-02-06· cited 16×
- Cutner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-04-28· cited 11×
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-07-28· cited 8×
- State v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-12-15· cited 6×
- United States v. TerrazasNinth Circuit· 2006-07-19· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Montana v. HallSupreme Court· 1987-04-27· cited 172×
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-19· cited 78×
- Browning v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-12-11· cited 62×
- State v. MunnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-06-22· cited 43×
- Hopkins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-11-28· cited 23×
- State v. RiddleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-04-16· cited 14×
- Weinhauer v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-01· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.