Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/4/1999

State v. Johnston

Citations

510 S.E.2d 423
333 S.C. 459
1999 S.C. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a sentence which exceeds the maximum allowable is not a question of subject matter jurisdiction; thus, unless an objection was made to the sentence at trial, the issue is not preserved for review
stating that a challenge to sentencing must be raised at trial, or the issue will not be preserved for appellate review
noting our supreme court “has consistently held that a challenge to sentencing must be raised at trial, or the issue will not be preserved for appellate review”
noting Supreme Court has consistently held that a challenge to sentencing must be raised at trial, or the issue will not be preserved for appellate review.
“[T]his [cjourt has consistently held that a challenge to sentencing must be raised at trial, or the issue will not be preserved for appellate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Finney, Moore, Waller, Gregory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.