Richardson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that defendant who pleads guilty upon advice of counsel may only attack the voluntary and intelligent character of plea by showing that advice he received from counsel was not within range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases
• explaining that defendant who pleads guilty upon advice of counsel may only attack the voluntary and intelligent character of plea by showing that advice he received from counsel was not within range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases
• affirming the dismissal of a PCR application because there was some probative evidence in the record to support the PCR court’s finding that trial counsel’s performance was not deficient
• grant of PCR, was inappropriate where after having heard incorrect information concerning guilty plea, applicant’s is impressions were corrected by accurate information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Al-Shabazz v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-14· cited 168×
• Carter v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-19· cited 78×
• Roddy v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-22· cited 33×
• Wolfe v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-05-12· cited 25×
• Bennett v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-11-27· cited 10×
• Simpson v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-02-13· cited 8×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Hill v. Lockhart
  Supreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
• High v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 22×