Locke v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “[a] circuit court has subject matter jurisdiction if ... there has been an indictment which sufficiently states the offense____”
• “Indictment language ‘taking of goods and/or monies from the person or presence of’ alleged the substance of asportation . . . was sufficient because asportation merely meant the taking of an object with felonious intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gentry
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-03-07· cited 229×
• State v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-05· cited 161×
• State v. Hamilton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-03-12· cited 71×
• State v. Guthrie
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-10-28· cited 22×
• State v. Dudley
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-14· cited 17×
• State v. Benjamin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-02· cited 14×
• Koon v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-04-05· cited 11×
• Simon v. Government of the Virgin Islands
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2002-07-18· cited 11×
• State v. Rosemond
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-11· cited 8×
• State v. Bullard
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-02-04· cited 7×
• State v. McCloud
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-04-14· cited 4×
• State v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-01-29· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carter v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-19· cited 78×
• Granger v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-10-26· cited 15×
• Weinhauer v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-01· cited 12×