Billodeau v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Rule 613(b) is exception to general prohibition against admission of specific instances of bad conduct
• holding child’s threat to accuse different person of molestation should have been admitted in defendant’s trial
• holding trial court abused discretion when it excluded evidence that complainant had made false sexual assault 16 allegations against others because such evidence revealed a possible motive for accusing defendant of sexual molestation
• stating that trial court may impose reasonable restrictions on cross-examination
• stating that trial court may impose reasonable restrictions on cross-examination
• child’s threat to accuse different person of molestation should have been admitted in defendant’s trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).