Skip to main content

Walker v. State

Citations

  • 300 S.W.3d 836
  • 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 7763
  • 2009 WL 3153288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he Confrontation Clause guarantees an opportunity for effective cross-examination, not cross-examination that is effective in whatever way, and to whatever extent, the defense might wish.”
  • if appellant fails to request limiting instruction when evidence is admitted, appellant does not preserve
  • “A trial court has the discretion to limit testimony that may confuse the issues or be only marginally relevant.”
  • \we assume that the jury would follow the instructions as given\
  • “we assume that the jury would follow the instructions as given”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livingston, Dauphinot, Meier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.