Carmona v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding based on evaluation of record that it was “not irrational for the trial court to infer” that the client authorized a disclosure of privileged communications, “hoping for favorable results”
• “Waiver may be found . . . from conduct such as partial disclosure which would make it unfair for the client to invoke the privilege thereafter.”
• “The privilege claimant must prove the existence of the privilege.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).