Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/6/1996
Austin v. State
Citations
- 934 S.W.2d 672
- 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 222
- 1996 WL 638226
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- purpose of privilege is to promote communications by protecting against fear that confidences will later be revealed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baird, Clinton, Maloney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-12-03· cited 236×
- Monreal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-11· cited 206×
- Carmona v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-03-26· cited 85×
- Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-15· cited 84×
- Troy Williams II v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-11-14· cited 58×
- State v. ReganCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-02-26· cited 35×
- In Re Columbia Valley Regional Medical CenterTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-03-08· cited 32×
- Broussard v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-01-10· cited 29×
- Head v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-09-30· cited 28×
- Sanford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2000-01-06· cited 25×
- Kenneth Cooper McAfee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-05-12· cited 22×
- State v. DavisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-12-12· cited 21×
- Neugebauer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1998-07-13· cited 19×
- Carmona v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1997-06-05· cited 17×
- Jones v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1999-03-25· cited 14×
- Kay v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2011-05-24· cited 10×
- Harris v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-11-21· cited 9×
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-12-14· cited 9×
- Lajuan Cecile Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-07-23· cited 8×
- Sweeney v. Mont. Third Judicial Dist. CourtMontana Supreme Court· 2018-04-24· cited 6×
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-17· cited 3,060×
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-09· cited 1,829×
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationD. Massachusetts· 1950-03-10· cited 503×
- Brasfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-06-18· cited 278×
- Ex Parte MenchacaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-05-12· cited 222×
- Peeples v. Honorable Fourth Supreme Judicial DistrictTexas Supreme Court· 1985-10-16· cited 192×
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-03-12· cited 185×
- Arcila v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-24· cited 182×
- Jordan v. Honorable Court of Appeals for the Fourth Supreme Judicial DistrictTexas Supreme Court· 1985-11-20· cited 162×
- Millanes-Ruiz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-06-21· cited 103×
- United States v. Jesse Ray PipkinsFifth Circuit· 1976-03-11· cited 93×
- United States v. Charles P. BourassaTenth Circuit· 1969-05-15· cited 77×
- Giffin v. SmithTexas Supreme Court· 1985-04-10· cited 74×
- Duval County Ranch Co. v. Alamo Lumber Co.Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1983-12-21· cited 73×
- United States v. Dennis Richard HallSecond Circuit· 1965-06-09· cited 70×
- United States v. Leroy KendrickFourth Circuit· 1964-04-15· cited 69×
- Church v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-06-08· cited 65×
- Maryland American General Insurance Co. v. BlackmonTexas Supreme Court· 1982-07-21· cited 61×
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1986-10-27· cited 51×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.