Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/4/1998

State v. Terrazas

Citations

962 S.W.2d 38
1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 16
1998 WL 40228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

determining that court of appeals erred by holding that trial court lacked authority to grant motion dismissing indictment
observing that “[t]he list of authorized dismissal situations in Johnson . . . was a list of examples only”
“For example, disciplinary rule violations are not grounds for reversal of a conviction; any remedy for such violations must be sought through processes provided by the State Bar.”
“For example, disciplinary rule violations are not grounds for reversal of a conviction; any remedy for such violations must be sought through processes provided by the State Bar.”
“For example, disciplinary rule violations are not grounds for reversal of a conviction; any remedy for such violations must be sought through processes provided by the State Bar.”
“For example, disciplinary rule violations are not grounds for reversal of a conviction; any remedy for such violations must be sought through processes provided by the State Bar.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, McCormick, Baird, Overstreet, Meyers, Womack, Mansfield, Keller, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

106 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.