Skip to main content

Washington v. State

Citations

  • 856 S.W.2d 184
  • 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the rule is not implicated until such time as a party attempts to have a portion of it ‘given in evidence’”
  • when a work product privilege is claimed, the defendant is entitled to in camera review of documents for a determination of whether they are discoverable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird, Campbell, McCormick, Meyers, Miller, Overstreet, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.