Skip to main content

Burgess v. State

Citations

  • 264 Ga. 777
  • 450 S.E.2d 680
  • 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 3985
  • 1994 Ga. LEXIS 914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[t]here is no constitutional impediment to th[e] statutory requirement that the defendant meet a beyond a reasonable doubt standard as to the issue of mental retardation.” (Emphasis supplied.)
  • holding that \[t]here is no constitutional impediment to th[e] statutory requirement that the defendant meet a beyond a reasonable doubt standard as to the issue of mental retardation.\ (Emphasis supplied.)
  • requiring Simmons instruction only when State argues future dangerousness during sentencing and state law prohibits release on parole, but here defendant eligible for parole
  • distinguishing Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U. S. 154 (114 SC 2187, 129 LE2d 133) (1994
  • “[I]t is clear that the intent of [Fleming v. Zant, 259 Ga. 687 (386 SE2d 339) (1989
  • certified copy of conviction along with detailed testimony of an accomplice to that crime sufficient to render independent crime admissible in trial of current offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley, Hunt, Fletcher, Sears, Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.