Skip to main content

Stephens v. State

Citations

  • 405 S.E.2d 483
  • 261 Ga. 467
  • 1991 Ga. LEXIS 332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to view as harmless the trial court’s failure to follow the applicable requirements for courtroom closure, including making written findings of fact and conclusions of law
  • analyzing error in admission of similar transaction evidence for harmless error
  • OCGA § 16-13-30 (d) does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment under the Georgia Constitution
  • “[T]he requirements outlined in Lumpkin [regarding a written order with specific findings] do apply to the situation in this case, where the court excludes the general public but permits the news media to remain.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunt, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

128 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.