Skip to main content

McClain v. State

Citations

  • 477 S.E.2d 814
  • 267 Ga. 378
  • 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 3982
  • 1996 Ga. LEXIS 925
  • 1996 WL 653805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the comment flagged by the appellant “was made after the prosecutor outlined the evidence showing [appellant’s] intent, and the remarks were clearly responsive to [appellant’s
  • distinguishing those cases where the potential juror had a close relationship with the parties or the victim
  • describing a “golden rule” argument as “[a]ny argument, regardless of nomenclature, which importunes the jury to place itself in the position of the victim for any purpose.”
  • allowing victim-impact evidence when it did not encourage comparative judgments and was not a “detailed narrative of the emotional and economic suffering of the community”
  • allowing victim-impact evidence when it did not encourage comparative judgments and was not a \detailed narrative of the emotional and economic suffering of the community\
  • finding, where defendant argued that the prosecutor, rather than the trial court, read written questions to defendant allegedly in violation of OCGA § 17-10-1.2(b)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sears

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

129 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.