Skip to main content

Pope v. State

Citations

  • 345 S.E.2d 831
  • 256 Ga. 195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the statute that classifies the records of the Board of Pardons and Paroles must yield to a capital defendant’s constitutional right to mitigating evidence
  • requiring a showing of such disregard of the essential and substantial provisions of OCGA § 15-12-20 as would vitiate the jury arrays
  • noting the distinction between intent and insanity: the defendant “may be capable of formulating a plan with an awareness that carrying out the plan will likely result in the death of another, and yet be incapable of understanding the difference between right and wrong”
  • “[W]e ‘do not find here such disregard of the essential and substantial provisions of the statute as would vitiate the arrays/ ”
  • \[W]e `do not find here such disregard of the essential and substantial provisions of the statute as would vitiate the arrays.'\
  • policy reasons for preserving the secrecy of parole files must give way to capital defendant's need to uncover and present mitigating evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gregory, Marshall, Weltner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

144 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.