Isaacs v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not err in finding that jurors were qualified to serve despite the defendant's challenges on \reverse- Witherspoon grounds\
• holding that the trial court did not err in finding that jurors were qualified to serve despite the defendant’s challenges on “revers e-Witherspoon grounds”
• recognizing separate theories of presumed, actual prejudice available to demonstrate grounds for requested venue change
• noting that it is unconstitutional to instruct a jury “that a finding of fact x legally follows from proof of fact y”
• noting that Isaacs had opportunity to recreate the record during earlier remand
• noting that Isaacs had opportunity to recreate the record during earlier remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).