Tenth Circuit· 1/26/1994

Harris v. Champion

Citations

15 F.3d 1538
1994 WL 19625

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an inordinate delay in a state court’s adjudication of a defendant’s direct criminal appeal may give rise to a due process violation
holding that a district court judge’s violation of § 455(b) for failure to recuse was harmless error that did not warrant vacatur
holding that inordinate delay in adjudicating a state defendant’s direct criminal appeal could give rise to an independent due process violation and identifying factors to be considered
holding that “delay in adjudicating a direct criminal appeal beyond two years from the filing of the notice of appeal gives rise to a presumption that the state appellate process is ineffective”
concluding two-year delay in adjudicating direct criminal appeal gives rise to presumption of inordinate delay
concluding that a two-year delay created a rebuttable presumption of excessive delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brorby, Ebel, Logan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

135 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

92 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Harris v. Champion

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.