Rondon v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to uncover evidence beyond that provided by the State in discovery
• holding that “trial counsel’s decision to put the State to its burden without conducting an investigation to discover information beyond what the State had supplied through discovery was reasonable under the circumstances”
• finding no ineffective assistance of counsel where counsel did not discover information beyond what the State had supplied, which included witnesses’ statements, police reports, inventory reports, photographs, lab reports, arrest reports, and an autopsy report
• “We will review the post-conviction court’s decision to exclude the proffered evidence applying an abuse of discretion standard of review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).