Skip to main content

Clark v. State

Citations

  • 561 N.E.2d 759
  • 1990 Ind. LEXIS 212
  • 1990 WL 168201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Absent a showing that a proper objection would have been sustained by the trial court, appellant cannot prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.
  • Absent a showing that a proper objection would have been sustained by the trial court, appellant cannot prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.
  • “[The police officer] stated that the vehicle ran over a large pile of leaves, swerved to avoid a parked car, and ran a four-way stop. This uncontroverted evidence constituted probable cause for a stop.”
  • failure to instruct jury about Article I section 19 powers during habitual offender phase of trial was not fundamental error; jurors were instructed on the issue during phase one of the trial
  • “[The police officer] stated that the vehicle ran over a large pile of leaves, swerved to avoid a parked car, and ran a four-way stop. This uncontroverted evidence constituted probable cause for a stop.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Shepard, Dickson, Givan, Pivarnik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.