Indiana Supreme Court· 11/1/1990
Clark v. State
Citations
- 561 N.E.2d 759
- 1990 Ind. LEXIS 212
- 1990 WL 168201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Absent a showing that a proper objection would have been sustained by the trial court, appellant cannot prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.
- Absent a showing that a proper objection would have been sustained by the trial court, appellant cannot prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.
- “[The police officer] stated that the vehicle ran over a large pile of leaves, swerved to avoid a parked car, and ran a four-way stop. This uncontroverted evidence constituted probable cause for a stop.”
- failure to instruct jury about Article I section 19 powers during habitual offender phase of trial was not fundamental error; jurors were instructed on the issue during phase one of the trial
- “[The police officer] stated that the vehicle ran over a large pile of leaves, swerved to avoid a parked car, and ran a four-way stop. This uncontroverted evidence constituted probable cause for a stop.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Debruler, Shepard, Dickson, Givan, Pivarnik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Randy L. Knapp v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2014-06-12· cited 270×
- Weatherford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-08-31· cited 251×
- Barany v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-11-16· cited 155×
- Lowery v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-10-04· cited 141×
- Mitchem v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-09-05· cited 132×
- Potter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-08-25· cited 98×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-03-02· cited 97×
- Warren v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-03-23· cited 96×
- State v. Moss-DwyerIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-10-23· cited 96×
- Bethel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-06-16· cited 84×
- Ellis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-10-18· cited 81×
- William Clyde Gibson III v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2016-04-12· cited 73×
- Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-11-28· cited 70×
- McCollum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 57×
- Conner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 54×
- Best v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-02-15· cited 54×
- Person v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-02-20· cited 46×
- Seay v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-07-08· cited 45×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-09-13· cited 42×
- Baran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-09-01· cited 42×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court· 1983-06-28· cited 4,242×
- United States v. James Alvin Rhodes, A/K/A Mickey Rhodes, United States of America v. Garvey Martin Cheek, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 1985-12-26· cited 132×
- Takahashi v. Board of Trustees of Livingston Union School DistrictSupreme Court· 1986-06-16· cited 106×
- Loza v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1975-04-03· cited 48×
- Parrish v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-11-24· cited 44×
- Mills v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-09-10· cited 44×
- Grigsby v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-02-02· cited 40×
- Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1977-04-19· cited 40×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-04-29· cited 34×
- Taylor v. IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-08-21· cited 33×
- Burkes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-03-08· cited 32×
- Menifee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-08-18· cited 20×
- Duncan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-11-09· cited 18×
- Law v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-07-21· cited 17×
- Hoffman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1988-03-25· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.