Indiana Supreme Court· 10/20/2000
Crain v. State
Citations
- 736 N.E.2d 1223
- 2000 Ind. LEXIS 978
- 2000 WL 1575791
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the trial court was not obligated to present a jury instruction regarding the voluntariness of defendant’s statements
- reviewing totality of the circumstances to ensure that waiver was “not induced by violence, threats, or other improper influences that overcame the defendant’s free will”
- finding no evidence of violence, threats, promises, or improper influence regarding the defendant’s 10 confession
- where defendant in murder case 22 “went beyond merely denying the charged culpability and affirmatively presented a claim of particular contrary intent—accidental killing[,]” evidence of prior batteries against the victim were admissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Boehm, Rucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-04-26· cited 124×
- Bryant v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-01-29· cited 76×
- Morales v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-06-08· cited 38×
- Bailey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-03-12· cited 37×
- D.M. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-06-22· cited 36×
- Scalissi v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-12-14· cited 35×
- Whatley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-06-17· cited 35×
- Simmons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-01-15· cited 32×
- Prewitt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-01-14· cited 31×
- Gauvin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-31· cited 28×
- Greenboam v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-04-30· cited 26×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-07-19· cited 21×
- Palacios v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-01-26· cited 20×
- Mark Anthony Poole v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2014-06-26· cited 20×
- Billy Luke v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2016-02-24· cited 20×
- Udarbe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-05-08· cited 19×
- Reynolds v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-10-27· cited 18×
- Harold Bishop v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-07-31· cited 17×
- Turney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-12-13· cited 12×
- Martin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-12-18· cited 11×
Cites
73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 1,932×
- State v. PikeTennessee Supreme Court· 1998-10-05· cited 465×
- Hicks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-23· cited 191×
- McNeal v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-07-06· cited 171×
- Terry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-07-09· cited 138×
- Wickizer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-27· cited 136×
- Widener v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-12-28· cited 125×
- Lindsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1973-05-11· cited 124×
- Whitener v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-06-04· cited 112×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-30· cited 110×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-03-02· cited 97×
- Allen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-09-25· cited 97×
- Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 96×
- Mayberry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-07-19· cited 91×
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-08-29· cited 91×
- Gregory v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-06-29· cited 89×
- Cook v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-23· cited 88×
- Willey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 85×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.