Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 5/28/2008
Brown v. Brown
Citations
- 665 S.E.2d 174
- 379 S.C. 271
- 2008 S.C. App. LEXIS 94
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that to receive a divorce on the ground of adultery, the spouse seeking the divorce must establish by clear and convincing evidence that infidelity occurred
- finding the family court erred in finding Husband's guns were marital property because Wife failed to present sufficient evidence that they were marital property
- stating adultery may be proven by circumstantial evidence, but the evidence must be sufficiently definite to establish both a disposition to commit the offense and the opportunity to do so
- stating adultery may be proven by circumstantial evidence, but the evidence must be sufficiently definite to establish both a disposition to commit the offense and the opportunity to do so
- finding both parties were at fault in allowing a timeshare to fall into foreclosure and holding the family court erred in assessing the value of the timeshare solely against the husband
- “The burden to show property is not subject to equitable distribution is upon the one claiming that property acquired during the marriage is not marital.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huff, Kittredge, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bojilov v. BojilovCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-09-19· cited 18×
- Srivastava v. SrivastavaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-12-23· cited 17×
- Stoney v. StoneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-08-29· cited 12×
- Gorecki v. GoreckiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-04-05· cited 8×
- McMillan v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-13· cited 7×
- Kennedy v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-07-21· cited 5×
- Stoney v. StoneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-27· cited 4×
- Thornton v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-10-02
- Hayduk v. HaydukCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-01-05
- Matthew J. Hayduk v. Emily Rudisill HaydukCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-05-04
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- E.D.M. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-03-16· cited 274×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-08-29· cited 186×
- Mallett v. MallettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-05-28· cited 59×
- Craig v. CraigSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-07-25· cited 47×
- Sexton v. SextonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-22· cited 46×
- McElveen v. McElveenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-09-14· cited 39×
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-02-08· cited 32×
- Brandi v. BrandiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-09-17· cited 31×
- Deidun v. DeidunCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-11-22· cited 31×
- Arnal v. ArnalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-02-07· cited 29×
- Panhorst v. PanhorstCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-02-20· cited 26×
- DuBose v. DuBoseSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-10-18· cited 23×
- Anders v. AndersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-05-28· cited 18×
- Hartley v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-04-27· cited 17×
- McLaurin v. McLaurinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-11-23· cited 16×
- Loftis v. LoftisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-01-07· cited 15×
- Nemeth v. NemethCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-01-13· cited 12×
- Fulton v. FultonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-07-20· cited 9×
- Fox v. FoxSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-02-24· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.