Skip to main content
· 2/7/2005

Arnal v. Arnal

Citations

  • 609 S.E.2d 821
  • 363 S.C. 268
  • 2005 S.C. App. LEXIS 35

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the determination of child visitation is within the family court's discretion and is controlled by the child's best interests
  • holding husband had no special equity in nonmarital property despite his testimony regarding the \use of his landscaping designs and his physical labor\ when there was \no testimony concerning any actual appreciation in value\ of the land
  • declining to address an issue when disposition of prior issues was dispositive
  • \This court will affirm the family court judge if it can be determined that the judge addressed the factors under [section 20-3-130(c)] . . . .\ (quoting Jenkins v. Jenkins, 345 S.C. 88, 100, 545 S.E.2d 531, 537 (Ct. App. 2001))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hearn, Huff, Kittredge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.