Nemeth v. Nemeth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the evidence was insufficient to prove the husband condoned the wife’s adultery by spending two nights in the home after the wife confessed her adultery when the husband testified they did not sleep together and there was no agreement to reconcile
• “[B]ecause adultery is an activity that takes place in private, the proof may be, and in fact generally will be, circumstantial”
• \Circumstantial evidence showing the opportunity and inclination to commit adultery is sufficient to establish a prima facie case.\ (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Michael D.C. v. Wanda L.C.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1997-10-24· cited 455×
• McElveen v. McElveen
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-09-14· cited 39×
• Brown v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-05-28· cited 21×
• Srivastava v. Srivastava
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-12-23· cited 17×
• Potts v. Potts
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-01· cited 13×
• Stiel v. Stiel
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2011-03-16· cited 9×
• Brown v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-06-04· cited 2×
• Thornton v. Thornton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-10-02

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Glasscock v. Glasscock
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-03-11· cited 284×
• E.D.M. v. T.A.M.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-03-16· cited 274×
• Cherry v. Thomasson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-07-09· cited 113×
• Nienow v. Nienow
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-02-09· cited 103×
• Smith v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-12-14· cited 48×
• Murphy v. Murphy
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-08-07· cited 36×
• McLaughlin v. McLaughlin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-05-13· cited 33×
• Panhorst v. Panhorst
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-02-20· cited 26×
• Hough v. Hough
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-01-17· cited 20×
• Rgm v. Dem
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-10-28· cited 18×
• McLaurin v. McLaurin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-11-23· cited 16×
• Loftis v. Loftis
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-01-07· cited 15×
• Rish v. Rish Ex Rel. Barry
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-06-27· cited 14×
• Kirsch v. Kirsch
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1989-07-31· cited 11×
• Ariail v. Ariail
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-05-09· cited 11×
• Wannamaker v. Wannamaker
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-01-07· cited 10×
• Bull v. Smith
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-07-31· cited 8×
• Langston v. Langston
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-11-17· cited 6×