Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/25/2005
Craig v. Craig
Citations
- 617 S.E.2d 359
- 365 S.C. 285
- 2005 S.C. LEXIS 214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding $3,000 permanent periodic alimony when parties were married for twenty-five years, they had a high standard of living, and husband’s infidelity led to the break-up of the marriage
- finding a fifty-fifty apportionment appropriate where the marriage lasted over thirty years
- division of marital property is within family court’s discretion and will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion
- “Generally, alimony should place the supported spouse, as nearly as is practical, in the same position he or she enjoyed during the marriage.”
- An award of alimony rests within the sound discretion of the family court and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.
- An award of alimony rests within the sound discretion of the family court and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Doe v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-07-03· cited 120×
- Crossland v. CrosslandSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-07-02· cited 58×
- Pirri v. PirriCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-05-22· cited 44×
- Miles v. MilesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-31· cited 44×
- Bodkin v. BodkinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-05-27· cited 43×
- King v. KingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-16· cited 42×
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-05-28· cited 21×
- Myers v. MyersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-01-20· cited 21×
- Dawkins v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-01-04· cited 17×
- Fitzwater v. FitzwaterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-12-14· cited 14×
- Avery v. AveryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-08-14· cited 13×
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-04-08· cited 10×
- Gorecki v. GoreckiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-04-05· cited 8×
- Pittman v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-10-18· cited 8×
- Grumbos v. GrumbosCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-04-27· cited 8×
- LaFrance v. LaFranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-10-02· cited 6×
- Kennedy v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-07-21· cited 5×
- Fredrickson v. SchulzeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-04-13· cited 4×
- Conits v. ConitsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-03-16· cited 3×
- Mosley v. MosleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-11-10· cited 2×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Donahue v. DonahueSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-09-25· cited 100×
- Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-10-29· cited 90×
- Dearybury v. DearyburySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-08-26· cited 64×
- Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-10-31· cited 52×
- Whitfield v. HanksSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-06-29· cited 21×
- Christy v. ChristyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-11-04· cited 21×
- Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-04-04· cited 20×
- Thompson v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-09-24· cited 18×
- Craig v. CraigCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-22· cited 16×
- Spence v. SpenceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-06-18· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.