Anders v. Anders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• either circumstantial or direct evidence, or a combination of the two, may be sufficient to prove adultery as grounds for a divorce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Donahue v. Donahue
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-09-25· cited 100×
• Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of God
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-26· cited 81×
• Brown v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-05-28· cited 21×
• Hartley v. Hartley
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-04-27· cited 17×
• Prevatte v. Prevatte
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1989-01-23· cited 14×
• Thomson v. Thomson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-04-25· cited 13×
• Fulton v. Fulton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-07-20· cited 9×
• Gorecki v. Gorecki
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-04-05· cited 8×
• Kennedy v. Kennedy
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-07-21· cited 5×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lee v. Lee
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-01-24· cited 28×
• Odom v. Odom
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1966-07-05· cited 27×
• Crowder v. Crowder
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1965-07-22· cited 22×
• Barstow v. Barstow
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1953-02-10· cited 9×
• Gill v. Gill
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-09-08· cited 7×