Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 12/7/1994

Brown v. Brown

Citations

  • 913 S.W.2d 163
  • 1994 Tenn. App. LEXIS 711

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that fair interpretation of trial court’s memorandum opinion was determination that husband’s interest in family business was his separate property because it was gift to him alone from his father
  • “The division of a marital estate necessarily begins with the classification of the parties’ property as either marital or separate property.”
  • “The division of a marital estate necessarily begins with the classification of the parties’ property as either marital or separate property.”
  • “Trial courts have wide latitude in fashioning an equitable division of marital property. Their decisions must be guided by the factors in Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-121(c).”
  • “Trial courts have wide latitude in fashioning an equitable division of marital property. Their decisions must be guided by the factors in Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-121(c) . . . .” (citations omitted)
  • No Tenn. R.App. P. 11 application filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koch, Todd, Cantrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

256 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Brown v. Brown

963 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.