District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/2/1997
Brock v. Brock
Citations
- 690 So. 2d 737
- 1997 WL 154366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that where there was insufficient evidence to support findings on valuation, remand was appropriate for the court to take additional testimony to determine valuation of assets and liabilities
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: W. Sharp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Doyle v. DoyleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-07-13· cited 24×
- Matajek v. SkowronskaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-31· cited 24×
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-30· cited 14×
- Bacon v. BaconDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-26· cited 14×
- Geoghegan v. GeogheganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-16· cited 13×
- Overbay v. OverbayNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-03-18· cited 11×
- Pietras v. PietrasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-26· cited 10×
- Holmes v. HolmesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-27· cited 8×
- Henin v. HeninDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-06· cited 7×
- Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-07· cited 7×
- Nelson v. NelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-01· cited 6×
- Barabas v. BarabasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-24· cited 6×
- Wagner v. WagnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-31· cited 6×
- Cook v. CookDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-24· cited 5×
- Johnson v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-27· cited 5×
- Serbousek v. LucasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-05-20· cited 4×
- Reddell v. ReddellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-01· cited 3×
- Spitulski v. SpitulskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-31· cited 2×
- DiNARDO v. DiNARDODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-08· cited 2×
- Van Den Berg v. Van Den BergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-15· cited 1×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Noah v. NoahSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 54×
- Gentile v. GentileDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-01· cited 54×
- De Cenzo v. De CenzoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-05· cited 40×
- DeLoach v. DeLoachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-21· cited 39×
- Moon v. MoonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-19· cited 33×
- McIntyre v. McIntyreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-14· cited 28×
- McCloskey v. McCloskeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-05-16· cited 28×
- Miller v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-05· cited 26×
- Akers v. AkersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-21· cited 26×
- McLean v. McLeanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-10· cited 24×
- Rosenfeld v. RosenfeldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-12· cited 24×
- Cooper v. CooperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-01· cited 24×
- Vaccaro v. VaccaroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-12· cited 22×
- Lanier v. LanierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-11· cited 22×
- Kovar v. KovarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-14· cited 21×
- Eckroade v. EckroadeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-02· cited 21×
- Dyson v. DysonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-02· cited 21×
- Shiveley v. ShiveleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-22· cited 21×
- Carroll v. CarrollDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-07-02· cited 21×
- Polley v. PolleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-22· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.