Skip to main content
· 11/16/2007

Geoghegan v. Geoghegan

Citations

  • 969 So. 2d 482
  • 2007 WL 3390894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[i]n order to facilitate meaningful appellate review of the trial court’s alimony determination, it is incumbent upon the trial court to include specific findings of fact regarding the factors enumerated in section 61.08(2)(a)-(g)”
  • certain stock options should have been included in income for purposes of alimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Monaco

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.