Lanier v. Lanier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that rehabilitative alimony is appropriate when \`the evidence suggests that the wife can be rehabilitated to a financial stature that would permit her to become self-supporting.'\
• error to deny wife permanent periodic alimony where wife's earning potential as a school teacher was about $20,000 and husband earned about $50,000 at time of dissolution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Kennedy v. Kennedy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-23· cited 43×
• Brock v. Brock
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-02· cited 27×
• Hill v. Hooten
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-19· cited 26×
• Adams v. Adams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-02· cited 15×
• Bible v. Bible
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-14· cited 15×
• Crowley v. Crowley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-24· cited 13×
• Atkins v. Atkins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-31· cited 12×
• Cardillo v. Cardillo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-23· cited 10×
• Steinberg v. Steinberg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-13· cited 8×
• Fontana v. Fontana
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-27· cited 7×
• White v. White
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-31· cited 6×
• Anderson v. Anderson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-07· cited 4×
• Leon v. Leon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-20· cited 3×
• Hall v. Hall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-04· cited 3×
• Williams v. Williams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-11· cited 3×
• Goodman v. Goodman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-31· cited 2×
• Cunningham v. Cunningham
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-20· cited 2×
• Grant v. Grant
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-29· cited 2×
• Szuri v. Szuri
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-26· cited 1×
• Fitch v. Fitch
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-17· cited 1×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• De Cenzo v. De Cenzo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-05· cited 40×
• Antonini v. Antonini
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-14· cited 17×
• Cosgrove v. Cosgrove
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-07-22· cited 9×
• Allison v. Allison
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 8×
• Hitt v. Hitt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-12· cited 7×
• Neumann v. Neumann
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-30· cited 7×
• Wagers v. Wagers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-20· cited 6×
• Holcomb v. Holcomb
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-29· cited 6×
• Pfaffko v. Pfaffko
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-03-09· cited 5×
• Rao v. Rao
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-30· cited 4×
• Salisbury v. Salisbury
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-18· cited 2×
• Enfinger v. Enfinger
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-13· cited 1×