District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/10/1995
McLean v. McLean
Citations
- 652 So. 2d 1178
- 1995 WL 96798
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that on remand \[t]he trial court is free to consider the parties' present economic circumstances\
- error to reduce medical doctor's income based upon potential for reduced income due to health and emotional difficulties
- evidence did not support award of rehabilitative alimony where there was a great disparity in income and trial court did not make finding about rehabilitative plan
- error to reduce medical doctor’s income based upon potential for reduced income due to health and emotional difficulties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Altenbernd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brock v. BrockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-02· cited 27×
- Ruberg v. RubergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-07· cited 21×
- Oxley v. OxleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-04· cited 18×
- Lauro v. LauroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-22· cited 15×
- Elliott v. ElliottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-05· cited 13×
- Laz v. LazDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-04· cited 13×
- Italiano v. ItalianoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-21· cited 12×
- Cardillo v. CardilloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-23· cited 10×
- Carlton v. CarltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-29· cited 9×
- Sherlock v. SherlockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-07-13· cited 9×
- Winn v. WinnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-22· cited 7×
- LaSala v. LaSalaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-06· cited 4×
- Levine v. LevineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-17· cited 3×
- Quinones v. QuinonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-21· cited 3×
- Suit v. SuitDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-01· cited 2×
- Carlton v. CarltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-09· cited 1×
- Bloch v. BlochDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-12· cited 1×
- ERIK RITACCO v. BOBBIE RITACCODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-01-27
- McLean v. McLeanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-11
- Garcia-Ribeyro v. Garcia-RibeyroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-19
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pimm v. PimmSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-05-28· cited 121×
- Noah v. NoahSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 54×
- Grapin v. GrapinSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-05-17· cited 52×
- Kilbride v. KilbrideMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-10-18· cited 26×
- Collinsworth v. CollinsworthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-12· cited 24×
- Carr v. CarrDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-16· cited 23×
- Nisbeth v. NisbethDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-07· cited 16×
- Madson v. MadsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-16· cited 16×
- Bible v. BibleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-14· cited 15×
- Heike v. HeikeMichigan Court of Appeals· 1993-02-16· cited 14×
- Lochridge v. LochridgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-06-15· cited 9×
- Steinberg v. SteinbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-13· cited 8×
- Barry v. BarryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-29· cited 8×
- In Re Marriage of SwigersAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-11-14· cited 7×
- Martin v. MartinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-30· cited 6×
- Makowski v. MakowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-23· cited 4×
- Cloud v. CloudDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-23· cited 4×
- Schaeffer v. SchaefferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.