Shiveley v. Shiveley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding past gifts from spouse’s parents are not imputed as income
• noting “[w]e are also required to reverse the decision of the trial court to impute income to [former wife] based upon past gifts from her parents”
• unreceived gifts are mere expectancy and not property in divorce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).