District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/13/2001

Doyle v. Doyle

Citations

789 So. 2d 499
2001 WL 786799

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[Notwithstanding the trial court’s wide discretion in dissolution matters, this court must correct mathematical errors made by the trial court.”
“[N]otwithstanding the trial court’s wide discretion in 2 dissolution matters, this court must correct mathematical errors made by the trial court.”
“[Notwithstanding the trial court’s wide discretion in dissolution matters, [the appellate] court must correct mathematical errors_”
“[N]otwithstanding the trial court’s wide discretion in dissolution matters, [the appellate] court must correct mathematical errors . . . .” (citing Noone v. Noone, 727 So. 2d 972, 974 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998))
because the remedies of alimony, child support and equitable distribution are interrelated parts of an overall scheme, they should be viewed as a whole, not piecemeal
“Whether to grant an award of attorney’s fees is a matter within the trial court’s sound discretion; therefore, absent a showing of abuse of that discretion, the decision cannot be reversed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Palmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.